Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 1,777 |
| Posted: | | | | Fair enough. Like I originally stated, I do understand how people can approach this from different directions. For some folks, it's just gray enough to merit undocumented status locally. Frankly, for me it's on a case-by-case basis. I accept the Hitchcock one because I've read about it for over 20 years and have become conditioned to thinking of it as a cameo. |
|
Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1973/f197390a0b05b52a711ec3e4eac0a7656ef4e6bf" alt="High Rating" | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | Hitchcock thought it was a cameo. Are you people claiming to know more about film than Hitchcock? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c34ce/c34ce8676d17a1d620037e9f308bf69e500365ea" alt="" |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Wouldn't be the first time, Ace. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|