| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 869 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote:
Quoting paulb_99:
Quote:
This is a different situation. In your example we have 3 roles (Patty, MAxene and LaVerne) with one actor name (the Andrew Sister), so in this case a dividers is not allowed or needed.
In Dunkirk movie we have 2 actor's credited under one role and thus a divider, per rules, is needed.
No, it's basically the same. The credit in the OP is for two roles, "Flanagan and Allen", and one actor name, "Themselves".
--------------- And since the rules tell us Themselves could never be a name and thus becomes a role we have Themselves as role and Flanagan and Allen as names. Making it a completely different situation! Paul |
|
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,857 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting paulb_99: Quote:
And since the rules tell us Themselves could never be a name and thus becomes a role we have Themselves as role and Flanagan and Allen as names. Making it a completely different situation! Not really. We simply add an additional step to transpose the Role and Credited As data to satisfy that part of the Rules: "Normal" entry: Bud Flanagan [Themselves] as Flanagan and AllenChesney Allen [Themselves] as Flanagan and AllenTransposed entry: Bud Flanagan [Flanagan and Allen] as ThemselvesChesney Allen [Flanagan and Allen] as ThemselvesA divider is still not warranted. --------------- |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,414 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quote:
Bud Flanagan [Flanagan]
Chesney Allen [Allen] I'd go with that one. Unless it were an obvious collective like The Wachowski Brothers, I'd treat them as two different people instead of a collective. Under no circumstances would I use a group divider for this. | | | | "This movie has warped my fragile little mind." |
|