Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | I would absolutely vote against it. | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: September 30, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,805 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote: Invelos has made a stand against the majority of the users (20:64 poll result): I don't think they made a stand against the majority of the users, I think it's just a sad state of affairs that the screener(s) don't actually check anything that goes through anymore unless there's a huge outcry of no votes against the contribution. I recently saw a contribution approved, less than a few days after the previous contribution was approved, that removed absolutely everything that was correct about the cast and crew listing. Character names, common names, capitalization, putting back in uncredited (with no documentation), archived footage, removing all updated crew listings (visual effects, costume designers, makeup artists) etc. etc. simply because the contributor lied in his contribution notes, putting "cast and crew from film credits" when it was actually cloned from IMDB, and there wasn't anyone to vote no on the little owned contribution. If the "higher powers" had simply scanned the contribution and seen what was actually happening, it should've been declined. That however, is the state of the program we use. 4 yes votes? DONE! Who cares if the one no vote is actually the correct vote... I'd remove them and submit it again. I'd bet that most people that voted yes to the previous contribution to add the ADR, would vote yes to have them removed... And shockingly, I'd bet the screener(s) would accept it, no questions asked. | | | The night is calling. And it whispers to me soflty come and play. | | | Last edited: by Merrik |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,852 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Merrik: Quote: I'd remove them and submit it again. I'd bet that most people that voted yes to the previous contribution to add the ADR, would vote yes to have them removed... And shockingly, I'd be the screener(s) would accept it, no questions asked. You're probably correct, which is why I wouldn't re-submit. What's the point? The screeners don't care, and the voters don't care. --------------- |
|