I was wondering how big of a difference there is between the free and premium version when it comes to cover quality.  What resolution are the "high resolution" covers?  Thanks!

Following on that, the low-res covers are something like 150x200.  So you can expect something along the lines of slightly better than a 3X improvement in the hi-res scans.

Quoting tweeter:

Quote:
It is often amazing what can be done with 500x700.  I use scans double that size locally but am often very impressed (to the point i don't bother trying to submit an update) with the existing scans.

That plus the ability to track more than 50 discs is worth the US$29.95.

It provides an outlet for my latent obsessive compulsive tendencies. 

I was about to say something along those lines. The pro scans are more of an improvment than the numbers would suggest they would be, and everything else is addictive (including the forums).

Does anyone still a collection of 50 or under?

Quoting mdnitoil:

Quote:
Following on that, the low-res covers are something like 150x200.

150*200=30000pixels
500*700=350000pixels

350000/30000=11,7

Quote:

So you can expect something along the lines of slightly better than a 3X improvement in the hi-res scans.

My math says more like 12 times better, if we only compare the amount of pixels.

EDIT: should have read the last post before reply.

I'm anal about my covers.  I go through a ritual of two main steps whenever I purchase another batch of movies.

1. Add to DVDP
2. Inspect the cover quality.

If the cover quality isn't up to par (and my par is high), I rescan the cover and optimize it for submission.

However, I'm finding more and more often that I don't need to rescan anything.  I added 20+ movies to my collection and only two were deemed needing rescan.