| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 4,245 |
| | Posted: | | | |  Would the edition be 1. Special Edition: Divimax Series 2. Divimax Series: Special Edition |
|
| Registered: May 29, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,475 |
| | Posted: | | | | Special Divimax Series Edition  |
|
| Registered: November 24, 2008 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,289 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would personally say simply 'Special Edition'.
Isn't 'Divimax Series' more the collection it's part of? |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 20,111 |
| | Posted: | | | | A bunch of these "Divimax" releases are in the database... with differences all over the place:
Special Edition
Divimax Series Special Edition
Special Divimax Edition
The "Divimax Series" logo also appears on quite a few, which don't even display "Special Edition" or similar on the covers. Some of those have no Edition entered in the database, and some have it added as "Divimax Series"
Divimax is just an HD film transfer process, that Anchor Bay used on some older DVD releases.
As for this title in question, I can really see it as either way Kathy or GreyHulk listed. It has been in the database as just "Special Edition" for years however...it's a 2005 DVD release. | | | | Corey |
|
| Registered: September 18, 2008 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,650 |
| | Posted: | | | | Special Edition, Divimax Series |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kathy: Quote:
Special Divimax Series Edition This is actually my thought...exactly as your read it on the case. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,934 |
| | Posted: | | | | I think this should be applied similar to the argument for "Special 007 Edition".
The ruling said to ignore the 007 and it was just "Special Edition"
The edition on this, I believe, should be "Special Edition" or if you wish "Special Edition, Divimax Series" | | | | Last edited: by CharlieM |
|