Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3  Previous   Next
Incorrect data is incorrect data...
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,508
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
...even if it is taken from a previously approved profile.

Case in point: There is a contribution up for voting that adds cast and crew for the US blu-ray of The Rift. The contribution notes just say "Added cast and crew from previously approved US DVD profile ". It doesn't even say which profile. Even if there is only one DVD profile, it would be nice if the contributor mentioned the UPC.

However, the problem is that the contributor of the DVD profile copied the cast (and almost certainly also the crew) from IMDb. It doesn't take much to see that the role names do not match the end credits. Just because the contribution notes say the cast and crew were copied from the credits it doesn't necessarily mean that it is true. In this case the DVD contributor lied.

The moral of the story is this: Never trust that someone else did the job correctly. If you take the info from anywhere else but the actual credits, check to make sure that they match the credits. One way to do that is to use CastCrewCheck . It makes this really easy.
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorateo357
Registered: December 27, 2009
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 5,131
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Or maybe they could actually visually check the credits, instead of relying on a program to do the work for them. And if they can't take the time to check the cast/crew credits, keep the copied for yourself and don't upload the garbage to the database. You're not doing anyone a favor by short cutting it. No info is better than wrong info.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,508
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting ateo357:
Quote:
Or maybe they could actually visually check the credits, instead of relying on a program to do the work for them.

And maybe you should actually find out what the program is about before you make stupid remarks. 
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorateo357
Registered: December 27, 2009
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 5,131
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
Quoting ateo357:
Quote:
Or maybe they could actually visually check the credits, instead of relying on a program to do the work for them.

And maybe you should actually find out what the program is about before you make stupid remarks. 



no need to be an ass - Not putting down your program, it may be something that people need, I don't use it or any other program that would promote a short cut, that would limit my involvement, wouldn't want my brain to become unnecessary. A monkey can be trained to push buttons without having to know why.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,508
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting ateo357:
Quote:
I don't use it or any other program that would promote a short cut, that would limit my involvement, wouldn't want my brain to become unnecessary. A monkey can be trained to push buttons without having to know why.

And still you make assumptions without having any idea about what the program does. 
It's not a short cut, just a tool to help you check the credits more easily.
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorateo357
Registered: December 27, 2009
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 5,131
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
Quoting ateo357:
Quote:
I don't use it or any other program that would promote a short cut, that would limit my involvement, wouldn't want my brain to become unnecessary. A monkey can be trained to push buttons without having to know why.

And still you make assumptions without having any idea about what the program does. 
It's not a short cut, just a tool to help you check the credits more easily.



looking at the credits seems pretty easy to me.
In my computer room.
I've got my computer with the profile up on screen and one of my BD/DVD players next to it hooked up to a flat screen next to that, just for profiling purposes. Seemed to be more sensible than trying to do it all with only a computer.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorateo357
Registered: December 27, 2009
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 5,131
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
I'm doing it right now.
Watching The Boy in the Striped Pajamas (The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas) (2008).
and have noticed that the cast credited name of Zac Mattoon-O'Brien is credited incorrectly in 32 profiles in the database (31 as Zac Matoon-O'Brien & 1 as Zac Mattoon O'Brien) and on futher investigation into variables by using my lap top and streaming his other work and checking the credits, have found that the common name is indeed Zac Mattoon-O'Brien. all without switching screens. Got a program to do that?
 Last edited: by ateo357
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorMallrat
Registered: December 13, 2008
Reputation: High Rating
Netherlands Posts: 334
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
It is a helpful utility Gunnar. Ignore stupid comments from people who obviously hadn't even looked at it before posting. Thinking that using the tool could in any way cause wrong info getting into the database proves that.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,508
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Yeah. And this thread isn't really about the program. It's about not trusting other approved profiles, but rather checking for yourself, whether by doing it manually, with CastCrewCheck or by any other means.
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorateo357
Registered: December 27, 2009
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 5,131
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Mallrat:
Quote:
It is a helpful utility Gunnar. Ignore stupid comments from people who obviously hadn't even looked at it before posting. Thinking that using the tool could in any way cause wrong info getting into the database proves that.



Obviously you 2 don't understand my post, I would say stupid is on the other foot.
I've used the program before, but you still have to view the film credits to verify everything is correct.
So I cut 1 step out by just viewing the credits. How is that stupid.
I could copy and paste from another profile - download a 2nd profile, copy and paste to my profile, and view film credits to verify the are correct - so I cut out 2 steps by viewing the credits. How is that stupid.
Seems like adding more steps to get to the same result is a waste of time, only needed for government jobs.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKathy
Registered: May 29, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 3,475
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
This topic comes up every so often and I have always taken the stand that Copy and Paste is a great, time saving tool, even if it contains some incorrect data, and will continue to advocate its use. 

When I use this tool I will check the contribution notes to see where the contributor took the data. If the notes tell me the data is taken from the credits or other legitimate  sources that is acceptable to me.

I try to always remember to document exactly which DVD I am copying by documenting the UPC, EAN, or Disc Info I took the information from.  I also make a note about what the contributor's notes say the data came from.

So, when I copy and paste my notes will say something like "Cast and Crew copied from the invelos' database UPC 000000-000000. Documentation notes this data came from the DVD credits.".

Of course there is always a chance that someone might not be telling the truth about where they took the data. Thankfully in all my years using this program I can only remember one person who deliberately lied about where they got the data.

In most cases in when mistakes happen it occurs because the person does not follow the guidelines invelos' has in place regarding the contribution process.

So, even if there are occasional honest mistakes, I don't have a problem with them and neither does Ken or Gerri. There are a few reasons I fell this way.

First, when I contribute to the database I am likely to be contributing a complete profile. Cast and Crew are only a small part of what I am checking and updating.

Secondly, Ken has stated that a small mistake contained within a larger contribution is an acceptable trade off. But, I haven't found that cloning Cast and Crew contains that many mistakes.

Finally, Cast and Crew are, in the majority of cases, the same. The people that worked on the film does not change. So, I am confident that the data is correct in most cases.

There might be the rare instance that the Cast and Crew differ from one DVD to the next but they are few and can be dealt with on an individual basis.

I often am updating hundreds of obvious mistakes that are rampant in the database. These are time consuming enough as it is without having to spend more time double checking the work of others. I might as well do everything myself and that is not what this database is about.

The database is built on the contributions of the community. Eventually every DVD will be checked and any errors or omissions will be taken care of.
 Last edited: by Kathy
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,508
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Kathy:
Quote:
Eventually every DVD will be checked and any errors or omissions will be taken care of.
Oh, I think that's way, way too optimistic!

Quote:
Ken has stated that a small mistake contained within a larger contribution is an acceptable trade off.
Yes, but I'm not sure that he meant that to apply to IMDb cloned cast/crew. There are legal considerations there.

I will say that it is hopefully few contributors that outright lie about where the info comes from. But there are lots of contributions that do not specify a source. This is especially true for contributions from the Intervocative era which contain no contribution notes at all.
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,508
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I would also like to add that my impression of Ken's statement is that he meant that it isn't necessary to reject a contribution because of a minor mistake. I don't think it implies that you shouldn't make every effort to ensure that your data is 100% correct.
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKathy
Registered: May 29, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 3,475
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
I would also like to add that my impression of Ken's statement is that he meant that it isn't necessary to reject a contribution because of a minor mistake. I don't think it implies that you shouldn't make every effort to ensure that your data is 100% correct.


I understand the desire to want the database to be perfect but I've come to realize that perfection is impossible and always will be.

I won't spend lots of time trying to achieve something that can not be. I prefer contributing dozens of contributions correcting many mistakes rather than submitting one that is 100% correct.

There are many reasons I feel that way and I'm not even talking about those frustrating Birth Year and Common Name issues.

Over the years invelos' has updated the program which results in current data needing to be changed. Some that comes to mind arethe addition of Bold and Italics or the implementation of the Title capitalization tool.

The Bold/Italic change was long ago and I am still finding and correcting titles that need fixing.
 Last edited: by Kathy
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,508
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Kathy:
Quote:
I won't spend lots of time trying to achieve something that can not be. I prefer contributing dozens of contributions correcting many mistakes rather than submitting one that is 100% correct.
I get a feeling that maybe we're partly talking cross purposes here. I am not saying that when you are correcting a profile you have to make that profile 100% correct by correcting everything. I am saying that I think that you should make every effort to ensure that the data that you provide is correct. And that includes data copied from other profiles, in my opinion.

Just because we cannot make the database perfect there is no reason not to make it as good as we can. If you can't verify the data, you shouldn't include it. That's how I feel, anyway.
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKathy
Registered: May 29, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 3,475
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I understand and can appreciate your stance but I don't feel the the same.

If I copy and paste a profile and the contributor of that copied profile notes the data came from the credits I believe them.

I am not going to take the time to double check every profile - to me that is not what this database is about. It is based on trust and I accept that if a contributor says they took the data from the credits that is good enough for me.

If by chance there happens to be a few mistakes in a greater profile, that is not a problem for me. Any mistakes can be fixed and contributed later.

I seldom contribute Cast and Crew, it is too much trouble to deal with all the birth years and common names, unless those fields are empty.

In those cases I have no problem with copying another profile, without double checking that data, provided that profile notes the data was taken following invelos' rules.
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3  Previous   Next