Quoting Berak:

Quote:

Seriously? As I stated in my intial post, he had the chance to redeem himself when I updated the profile, but he choose to continue his path of deception and voted no on my perfectly valid update! If this doesn't qualify as a liar in your vocabulary - I wonder what does. 

Sorry if I did not state my point clearly enough. You have every right to call him a liar (as he seems to be), but perhaps not in the contribution notes. I do not think that contribution notes is a right forum on personal name calling. IMHO contribution notes are only for explaining the changes in the profile data and telling the sources of the data. I see no reason on commenting previous contribution notes with any kind of personal remarks (maybe this is only my view). I only reviewed your Jurassic Park III contribution, therefore I do not know how he has voted on your other contributions. I just thought that maybe the liar accusation triggered him to vote no (even though that vote is in violation with the rules).

Quoting Ken Cole:

Quote:
FYI this was addressed by Gerri.  The recontribution has already been accepted.  There's not much to add since we do not discuss member censure, if any, with members other than the affected member.

Thank you Ken, I see the recontribution has been accepted and I am very grateful for your response in the matter.

Keep on rockin'...