| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,188 |
| | Posted: | | | | When I did the profile for Disney's The Jungle Book, I assumed Lord was a title and entered him as Tim Hudson [Lord Tim Hudson]. He also appears in The Aristocats and this time I checked with IMDb and it appears that Lord is in fact part of his name. But then I don't really trust IMDb... But this time I entered him as Lord / Tim / Hudson. I just want to know if I should correct the entry in the Jungle Book or how to properly credit him. Lord Tim Hudson @ IMDbI also have a question regarding the original title for The Aristocats. In the screen credits, the title (which is also animated btw) has a very clear spacing between Aristo and Cats, making OT = The Aristo Cats. However, I've never seen this title used anywhere else than the screen credits... Should I just enter it as The AristoCats without the space? (Again, this is what IMDb does.) | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 3,830 |
| | Posted: | | | | Don't know if this will help: Déjà Vu (Dvd cover and copywrigt block on the cover) Opening title Screen: DEJA VU got several no votes: Quote:
Incorrect Original Title (Back Cover Credit Block)   | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,188 |
| | Posted: | | | | Well, unless I'm mislead, the original title can only come from the film itself. There is no "credit block" in this case, only a fact box, which claims that the title is Aristocats. This is of course the Swedish title, and not the original title.  | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,188 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 | | | | Last edited: by Nexus the Sixth |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 775 |
| | Posted: | | | | I actually looked up this guy while I was doing Jungle Book credits, Lord isn't his first name, it's just a title he uses. Official Site. I think I actually used a common name for it back then, I wouldn't do that now, just plain "Lord Tim//Hudson". There's actually a couple of them out there, maybe that's why he took on the "Lord" bit; so not only does it not now need a common name, but not even a birth year :/ | | | | Last edited: by Nadja |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Nadja is correct... Lord Tim//Hudson.
IMDb strikes again.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 1,777 |
| | Posted: | | | | Works for me. And that would make the current R1 profile for the latest release of Jungle Book wrong. That one's using a "credited as". |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 5,916 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yup, Lord included. This goes along with the military ranks ruling. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,188 |
| | Posted: | | | | Thanks, I'll update both the Swedish profiles then! | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 775 |
| | Posted: | | | | I think the R1 Aristocats is right, but if someone else could put the JUngle Book right that would be good, I'm using 3.5 primarily and it's a hassle going back into 3.1 to contribute  | | | | Last edited: by Nadja |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,242 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Nadja: Quote:
I'm using 3.5 primarily and it's a hassle going back into 3.1 to contribute Isn't it just  Steve |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,916 |
| | Posted: | | | | That's the only reason why I haven't made the port to 3.5 - not being able to contribute. Once that's enabled, here I come! |
|