Registered: May 18, 2007 | Posts: 389 |
| Posted: | | | | I recently came across this designation "Associate Visual Effects Supervisor" while updating SG-1 episodes and wondered if it would be allowed by the rules. |
|
Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1aaf/e1aaff965d83e3d0d6b5afc21035a20dc1595918" alt="Highest Rating" | Posts: 2,550 |
| Posted: | | | | Given we don't track Associate Producers, I'd say no. | | | Last edited: by The Movieman |
|
Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1973/f197390a0b05b52a711ec3e4eac0a7656ef4e6bf" alt="High Rating" | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | No it isn't. Associate may as well be Assistant and we don't do Assistants. | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 4,596 |
| Posted: | | | | Another No Vote here. Associate is just another term for assistant and we don't do assistants. | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
|
Registered: May 18, 2007 | Posts: 389 |
| |