| Author |
Message |
| Registered: November 24, 2008 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,289 |
| | Posted: | | | | How do we enter 'Contender Entertainment Group' in the Media Companies field? Contender Entertainment Group logoQuoting the rules - "Omit company suffixes such as LLC, Ltd., Inc." I have some DVDs listed under 'Contender Entertainment Group' and others under 'Contender Entertainment' in the database. Is 'Group' a company suffix which should be omitted? | | | | Last edited: by GreyHulk |
|
| Registered: October 30, 2011 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,870 |
| | Posted: | | | | I think group is part of the name.
I don't think group has anything to do with the legal status of the company like Inc, Ltd, S.A. and such have |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | Group is not a company suffix, but part of the name, so should be included. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote:
Group is not a company suffix, but part of the name, so should be included. ^^THIS! | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: November 24, 2008 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,289 |
| | Posted: | | | | Thanks for the pretty definitive decision. Some correcting to do tomorrow then. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote:
Group is not a company suffix, but part of the name, so should be included. I agree... Group would not be a company suffix. Other then that... I am not a studio person... so I must ask (trying to learn here).... That means for those listed as Contender Entertainment Group should be listed as such... but those listed just as Contender Entertainment should not have group on it since it is not "Group" in the credits? On one hand it makes sense to match the credits exactly. On the other hand Contender Entertainment won't link up with Contender Entertainment Group. Or am I confused... and GreyHulk meant that they all have "Group" in the credits... but not in profiler. Even if that is the case I am curios what the answer is. | | | | Pete |
|
  | Corne | | Registered: Nov. 1, 2000 |
| Registered: April 5, 2007 |  Posts: 1,059 |
| | Posted: | | | | That's an important discussion. It would be nice to be able to linking studios locally with a sort of 'credited as' feature. Even major studios like Twentieth Century Fox and Warner Bros. Pictures aren't credited the same over time. For example:
Twentieth Century Fox
Twentieth Century-Fox
Warner Bros.
Warner Bros. Pictures
Warner Bros.-First National
etc. | | | | Cor |
|
| Registered: November 24, 2008 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,289 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yes, A2DVD, all the DVDs I am enquiring about have the 'Contender Entertainment Group' copyright on them. When being contributed, some contributors have been removing the 'Group' part.
There is also 'Contender Home Entertainment' but this is a different credit. | | | | Last edited: by GreyHulk |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| |