Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1  Previous   Next
What exactly needs to be done to correct the assignment of a cast member in our database?
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registranttjenkins99
Registered: February 9, 2008
Posts: 113
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageDirect link to this postReply with quote
There are two actors with the same name of Jack O'Connell. One of them is an older actor and the other a younger actor. In our cast database, older Jack is referred to as 'Jack O'Connell' and younger Jack as "Jack O'Connell 1990". Younger Jack is in several movies and correctly assigned but in Private Peaceful and United older Jack is erroneously assigned to the character.  So what exactly am I supposed to say in the contribution to have this error fixed?

I opened the following two contributions and I can understand why the first was declined - but the second attempt - no idea why it was declined.


1). Here is my first contribution:

Corrected cast assignment for Bobby Charlton from Jack O'Connell to Jack O'Connell 1990.

Reason for rejection:
Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were non-specific. Please specify the exact source for your changes. (e.g. "Credits from film end credit list", "Previous version UPC#1111111111")


Both actors have the same name so looking at the film credits makes no distinction!


2). Here is my second contribution:
I watched this movie. The character of Bobby Charlton is played by the 24-year old actor Jack O'Connell. Our database has this character erroneously assigned to the "other" Jack O'Connell who is an older actor. Both of these actors are currently in our database and the younger one is designated as
"Jack O'Connell 1990".  I am submitting this contribution with the character reassigned to the younger "Jack O'Connell 1990". This is also documented on the IMDB website and Wikipedia.

Reason for rejection:
An invalid source, such as a third party database, was listed in the contribution notes. Use of a third party database is not allowed per the contribution rules.


What about the fact that I watched the movie???

Thanks.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorLewis_Prothero
Strength Through Unity
Registered: May 19, 2007
Reputation: Superior Rating
Germany Posts: 6,730
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
For changing this it would be helpfull to point to this post from the "Accepted BY"-Thread.

Sadly it seems that no BY for the older actor is to be found, so a real differentiation for the main-database is not possible.
For your local database you may want to use a fake BY though.
It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?


Registrant since 05/22/2003
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorCharlieM
Registered Sept 5 2005
Registered: May 20, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 2,934
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Lewis_Prothero:
Quote:
For changing this it would be helpfull to point to this post from the "Accepted BY"-Thread.

Sadly it seems that no BY for the older actor is to be found, so a real differentiation for the main-database is not possible.
For your local database you may want to use a fake BY though.



This^^
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorDJ Doena
Registered: May 1, 2002
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 6,745
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Also: Try to avoid mentioning the term "IMDb" in any contribution that has to do with cast & crew.

I have the strong suspicion that there are a few automatical filters at work and when you contribute cast and use the term IMDb it's going to reject you wihout any real person ever looking at the contribution.
Karsten
DVD Collectors Online

DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorRizor
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 554
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting tjenkins99:
Quote:
There are two actors with the same name of Jack O'Connell. One of them is an older actor and the other a younger actor. In our cast database, older Jack is referred to as 'Jack O'Connell' and younger Jack as "Jack O'Connell 1990". Younger Jack is in several movies and correctly assigned but in Private Peaceful and United older Jack is erroneously assigned to the character.  So what exactly am I supposed to say in the contribution to have this error fixed?

I opened the following two contributions and I can understand why the first was declined - but the second attempt - no idea why it was declined.


1). Here is my first contribution:

Corrected cast assignment for Bobby Charlton from Jack O'Connell to Jack O'Connell 1990.

Reason for rejection:
Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were non-specific. Please specify the exact source for your changes. (e.g. "Credits from film end credit list", "Previous version UPC#1111111111")


Both actors have the same name so looking at the film credits makes no distinction!


2). Here is my second contribution:
I watched this movie. The character of Bobby Charlton is played by the 24-year old actor Jack O'Connell. Our database has this character erroneously assigned to the "other" Jack O'Connell who is an older actor. Both of these actors are currently in our database and the younger one is designated as
"Jack O'Connell 1990".  I am submitting this contribution with the character reassigned to the younger "Jack O'Connell 1990". This is also documented on the IMDB website and Wikipedia.

Reason for rejection:
An invalid source, such as a third party database, was listed in the contribution notes. Use of a third party database is not allowed per the contribution rules.


What about the fact that I watched the movie???

Thanks.
There are 2 things you need to do.

1. Provide documented proof that there are 2 Jack O'Connells.
- In order for new BYs to be accepted, they first need to be submitted with documentation. Luckily, this BY was already submitted and as Lewis points out, documentation is provided in the BY thread.

2. Establish which Jack O'Connell is in the movie.
- Either through identification or with the help of multiple sources.

Your second submission sounds okay to me, but it probably needs the link to the BY thread. So something like:

"Added approved BY for actor Jack O'Connell (see: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=250804&PageNum=87&messageID=1633048#M1633048). I've watched the movie and have confirmed that this is the actor with the BY and have also consulted additional sources (IMDB, Wikipedia) which agree with my findings."
My DVD/Blu-ray Collection
My Letterboxd Page
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantGrendell
One disc at a time...
Registered: May 8, 2007
United States Posts: 824
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting tjenkins99:
Quote:
2). Here is my second contribution:
I watched this movie. The character of Bobby Charlton is played by the 24-year old actor Jack O'Connell. Our database has this character erroneously assigned to the "other" Jack O'Connell who is an older actor. Both of these actors are currently in our database and the younger one is designated as
"Jack O'Connell 1990".  I am submitting this contribution with the character reassigned to the younger "Jack O'Connell 1990". This is also documented on the IMDB website and Wikipedia.

Reason for rejection:
An invalid source, such as a third party database, was listed in the contribution notes. Use of a third party database is not allowed per the contribution rules.


What about the fact that I watched the movie???

Thanks.


It was the fact that you typed "IMDB" and "Wikipedia". Context doesn't matter, just the fact that you typed it will pretty much get a contribution instantly declined.

Do NOT make ANY MENTION WHATSOEVER to a third party database, ESPECIALLY IMDB, when contributing. Even saying "I did not use IMDB" will often get the contribution rejected, just because you said IMDB.
99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1."
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,202
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting DJ Doena:
Quote:
Also: Try to avoid mentioning the term "IMDb" in any contribution that has to do with cast & crew.

I have the strong suspicion that there are a few automatical filters at work and when you contribute cast and use the term IMDb it's going to reject you wihout any real person ever looking at the contribution.

I mention IMDb whenever I do TV series profiles and have yet to have a single one declined so don't believe there is a filter.  Seems like an honest mistake here.
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorAddicted2DVD
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 17,334
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I also often mention IMDb and Wikipedia in many of my contributions... and to be honest... can't remember the last time I got a decline. To be honest... can't remember the last no vote I got.

There is no automatic declines for mentioning such sites.... or I would have had several declines myself.
Pete
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorSpaceFreakMicha
Jesus-Freak
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Germany Posts: 1,774
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting TheMadMartian:
Quote:
I mention IMDb whenever I do TV series profiles and have yet to have a single one declined so don't believe there is a filter.  Seems like an honest mistake here.


Same here. Sometimes I check for rolenames imdb and tv.com and never had a problem.

I write something like "Cast taken from episode opening and ending credits, only missing rolenames taken from imdb.com and tv.com" and these were never declined.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorRizor
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 554
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
No problem mentioning IMDB or Wikipedia here either. It's fine to use either as one of several sources, just don't take the full cast & crew from IMDB or Wikipedia.
My DVD/Blu-ray Collection
My Letterboxd Page
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorSrehtims
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 1,796
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
First: The cast & crew list should have been entered as from the DVD and Credited As should have been Common Name field; After all we are expected to take the rest of the data from the DVD and this would make the data entry consistent. At least this way something would be correct and verifiable.
And the common name would be applied to that DVD and only that DVD.

Since DVD updates do not change the capitalization, parsing of middle names, date of birth this too could be updated with the rest of the data.

I'll be damned if I am going to spend my time trying to figure out what is correct or not when I get an update with these changes indicated especially when it not consistent and applied to all DVD with that cast or crew name. As it is now you have individually determine if you should change the data that profile which will no doubt change all profiles with that name whether it apples or not.

I can not think of any source that I would stake my life on, even the so called references have been proven wrong.
We don't need stinkin' IMDB's errors, we make our own.
Ineptocracy, You got to love it.
"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." - Abraham Lincoln
 Last edited: by Srehtims
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbbbbb
on steroids
Registered: March 14, 2007
Posts: 5,734
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
and to be honest... can't remember the last time I got a decline. To be honest... can't remember the last no vote I got.

My last no votes and subsequent decline were for:

"Cast: the German dubbers are not credited in the movie, the film ends at 1:42:29. Marked them Uncredited."
Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect]
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registranttjenkins99
Registered: February 9, 2008
Posts: 113
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageDirect link to this postReply with quote
Thanks for the suggestions but I think some people are missing the point. Both of the Jack O'Connell actors are already in our database and also in our database, the young Jack is correctly assigned to some of his movies and in the two movies that I mentioned he is not assigned correctly. I stated in my contribution that I watched the two movies and I really don't think I can provide any additional proof.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorKathy
Registered: May 29, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 3,475
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting tjenkins99:
Quote:
Thanks for the suggestions but I think some people are missing the point. Both of the Jack O'Connell actors are already in our database and also in our database, the young Jack is correctly assigned to some of his movies and in the two movies that I mentioned he is not assigned correctly. I stated in my contribution that I watched the two movies and I really don't think I can provide any additional proof.



When you submit Uncredited Cast, a prompt comes up stating:

"You have personally identified the cast by viewing the film
-OR- The cast is copied from a previously accepted profile with documented uncredited cast"

Since you watched the movie and can identify them, you do not need any more proof. Change any incorrect data and submit it. Document that you have personally identified those Cast members.

Edit: Don't forget to tick the box to submit Uncredited Cast.
 Last edited: by Kathy
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorRizor
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 554
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting tjenkins99:
Quote:
Thanks for the suggestions but I think some people are missing the point. Both of the Jack O'Connell actors are already in our database and also in our database, the young Jack is correctly assigned to some of his movies and in the two movies that I mentioned he is not assigned correctly. I stated in my contribution that I watched the two movies and I really don't think I can provide any additional proof.

It looks like all that needs to be contributed is the BY unless I'm misunderstanding you. As I said previously, all you really need to do is provide proof that the BY has been documented and approved by providing a link to the BY thread and that you've visually verified that it is indeed the younger actor in the movie.

Personally, I've never had any problems with these types of contributions. Just try copying and pasting this or typing something similar into the contribution notes:

"Added approved BY for actor Jack O'Connell (1990). http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=250804&PageNum=87&messageID=1633048#M1633048.
I've watched the movie and have verified that Jack O'Connell (1990) is the one in this film."
My DVD/Blu-ray Collection
My Letterboxd Page
 Last edited: by Rizor
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registranttjenkins99
Registered: February 9, 2008
Posts: 113
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageDirect link to this postReply with quote
Rizor, thanks for the post. I have submitted the contributions for Private Peaceful and United using the text that you provided.
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1  Previous   Next