Author |
Message |
Registered: May 16, 2010 | Reputation: | Posts: 516 |
| Posted: | | | | A new example for this is Interstellar: 1080p High Definition 16:9 Variabel 2.40:1 and 1.78:1 (IMAX®-Sequenzen). So, do we enter 1.78:1 or 2.40:1 in Videoformats or do we leave it empty?
Thanks,
Fritz | | | * 3D TV Panasonic TX-P65VT30J + Blu-ray Player Panasonic DMP-BDT500 My Filmcollection online: www.filmkino.ch * |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting SwissFilm: Quote: A new example for this is Interstellar: 1080p High Definition 16:9 Variabel 2.40:1 and 1.78:1 (IMAX®-Sequenzen). So, do we enter 1.78:1 or 2.40:1 in Videoformats or do we leave it empty?
We enter Interstellar the same way as The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises. | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
Registered: June 21, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,621 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote: Quoting SwissFilm:
Quote: A new example for this is Interstellar: 1080p High Definition 16:9 Variabel 2.40:1 and 1.78:1 (IMAX®-Sequenzen). So, do we enter 1.78:1 or 2.40:1 in Videoformats or do we leave it empty?
We enter Interstellar the same way as The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises. ... and which way is that? I just looked at my collection, Rises says 1.78, DK says 2.4. I do have exclusives for both, but can't lookup other versions by title, as that function does not work anymore on my desktop despite re-installing 5 times. Don't feel like hunting down upc #'s online, so how should these read? |
|
Registered: April 1, 2007 | Posts: 118 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bigdaddyhorse: Quote: but can't lookup other versions by title, as that function does not work anymore on my desktop despite re-installing 5 times. What happens when you try? | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Support Representative |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bigdaddyhorse: Quote:
Quote:
Quote: So, do we enter 1.78:1 or 2.40:1 in Videoformats or do we leave it empty? We enter Interstellar the same way as The Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Rises. ... and which way is that? The March 31 way. Quote: I just looked at my collection, Rises says 1.78, DK says 2.4. ?! The Dark Knight is "2.40:1", The Dark Knight Rises " :1". | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,852 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote: The March 31 way. When was the last time you tried to be helpful rather than just an irritant? --------------- |
|
Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | Don't feed the trolls! Back on topic: AFAIK there is no proper way of registering this in every detail. In any case you can tick Widescreen. Personally I would go for the ratio most used in the film. | | | Last edited: by dee1959jay |
|
Registered: October 17, 2010 | Posts: 298 |
| Posted: | | | | I think you should choose the most "open" format that is used. In this case someone who is watching with a projector will get the whole image. In the other case he might lose information because he's projecting in 2,40:1 and the image gets cropped at top and bottom. | | | Recently bought films:
The Matrix [Blu-ray] | Shirins Wedding [DVD] | The Graduate [Blu-ray] | Prometheus [Blu-ray 3D] | Hwal [DVD] |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote:
Quote: The March 31 way. When was the last time you tried to be helpful rather than just an irritant? I do not track this information, what do you think I am? An egocentric? But you can check it here. (only one year, so can't guarantee a hit) | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | Unfortunately, since we define Fullscreen as 1.33:1 there is no way to do this. If the program had recognized Fullscreen as 16:9 for Blu-ray, we could simply have ticked both Fullscreen and Widescreen. | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,217 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting iPatsa: Quote: If the program had recognized Fullscreen as 16:9 for Blu-ray, we could simply have ticked both Fullscreen and Widescreen. Although I like the idea behind it, that would have opened the gate for quite some ambiguity. How about "Fullscreen SD" (being 1,33:1) and "Fullscreen HD" (being 1,78:1)? | | | Mithi's little XSLT tinkering - the power of XML --- DVD-Profiler Mini-Wiki |
|
Registered: March 23, 2011 | Posts: 462 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting iPatsa: Quote: Unfortunately, since we define Fullscreen as 1.33:1 there is no way to do this. If the program had recognized Fullscreen as 16:9 for Blu-ray, we could simply have ticked both Fullscreen and Widescreen. I don't think we have defined Fullscreen? And we don't have a "Fullscreen" option. We have a "Full Frame" option (that has something to do with filling the frame of 35mm film which has aspect ratio: 4:3). |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | Sorry, I meant Full Frame. Ticking Full Frame automatically gives an 1.33:1 aspect ratio, at least according to the program's icon graphics.
But then we have material on HD that actually is 1.33:1 so making Full Frame HD default to 16:9 wouldn't work either. | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,217 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting iPatsa: Quote: But then we have material on HD that actually is 1.33:1 so making Full Frame HD default to 16:9 wouldn't work either. If the picture is 1.33:1 on a BD it certainly is not full frame. Whether there are black bars or black columns, they ain't counting as picture. | | | Mithi's little XSLT tinkering - the power of XML --- DVD-Profiler Mini-Wiki |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,852 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote: what do you think I am? Ill. --------------- |
|
Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,131 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting SwissFilm: Quote: A new example for this is Interstellar: 1080p High Definition 16:9 Variabel 2.40:1 and 1.78:1 (IMAX®-Sequenzen). So, do we enter 1.78:1 or 2.40:1 in Videoformats or do we leave it empty?
Thanks,
Fritz Tick WS. leave aspect blank. added to other features: Multiple aspect ratios. |
|