Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 4  Previous   Next
Wardrobe Direction?
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorninso4
Registered: January 16, 2010
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 1,617
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Since the question came up whether Wardrobe Direction is a valid credit according to the contribution rules I think it's good to know what others think about this.

This was my original post:
Quoting ninso4:
Quote:
The credit for The Day the Earth Stood Still looks like this:

In fact a lot of his credits should be under Wardrobe Direction (according to imdb) which isn't a valid credit according to the contribution rules.
In my opinion all those credits should be invalid.



But there's also this opinion:
Quoting scotthm:
Quote:
Quoting ninso4:
Quote:
In fact a lot of his credits should be under Wardrobe Direction (according to imdb) which isn't a valid credit according to the contribution rules.

Since the credit rules state, "Do include 'Supervising' credits in the above categories", and since a director supervises, I don't see this as being invalid.

---------------


All film that I checked in which Charles LeMaire is credited as Wardrobe Director also have an actual credit for a Costume Designer. So Wardrobe Direction isn't the only costume credit appearing there.

And I always assumed this paragraph from the rules should be taken literally:
Do include "Supervising" credits in the above categories, examples: "Supervising Art Director", "Makeup Supervisor", except where explicity forbidden above.
Which means a Wardrobe Supervisor (or something like that) would be okay, but a Wardrobe Director?

What do you think?
Think different

Everything will be okay in the end. If it's not okay, it's not the end.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorGreyHulk
Fixin' it for everyone..
Registered: November 24, 2008
Reputation: Highest Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 1,216
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I think this all depends on whether there are other valid wardrobe or costume credits on the relevant film.
If this is the ONLY wardrobe or costume credit then maybe we should include it.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorhuskersports
Registered: September 29, 2008
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 2,508
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
No
My one wish for the DVD Profiler online database: Ban or remove the disc-level profiles of TV season sets. It completely screws up/inflates the CLT.
FACT: Imdb is WRONG 70% of the time! Misspelled cast, incomplete cast, wrong cast/crew roles. So for those who want DVD Profiler to be "as perfect as Imdb", good luck with that.
Stop adding UNIT crew! They're invalid credits. Stop it!
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorRutan
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Australia Posts: 2,295
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Recording Director is now included should we infer Wardrobe Direction be as well?
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorObiKen
Registered: October 22, 2015
Reputation: Superior Rating
Australia Posts: 257
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Rutan:
Quote:
Recording Director is now included should we infer Wardrobe Direction be as well?

Your inference has merit. In addition, the rules also has for Visual Effects/Special Effects the qualifier "including Designer, Supervisor and Director".

The costume designer Charles LeMaire was the head of the Twentieth Century-Fox wardrobe department from 1943 to 1959.
He was in charge of designing and producing character/traditional costumes for the studio and would often use the services of additional costume designers to specialize on costumes for certain lead actresses.

Charles LeMaire was nominated sixteen (16) times for Best Costume Design at the Academy Awards:

1950 (23rd):
COSTUME DESIGN (B&W)  - All About Eve [Edith Head, Charles LeMaire] [OSCAR WINNER]
1951 (24th):
COSTUME DESIGN (B&W)  - The Model and the Marriage Broker [Charles LeMaire, Renie]
COSTUME DESIGN (Color) - David and Bathsheba [Charles LeMaire, Edward Stevenson]
1952 (25th):
COSTUME DESIGN (B&W)  - My Cousin Rachel [Charles LeMaire, Dorothy Jeakins]
COSTUME DESIGN (Color) - With a Song in My Heart [Charles LeMaire]
1953 (26th):
COSTUME DESIGN (B&W)  - The President's Lady [Charles LeMaire, Renie]
COSTUME DESIGN (Color) - How to Marry a Millionaire [Charles LeMaire, Travilla]
COSTUME DESIGN (Color) - The Robe [Charles LeMaire, Emile Santiago] [OSCAR WINNER]
1954 (27th):
COSTUME DESIGN (Color) - Desiree [Charles LeMaire, René Hubert]
COSTUME DESIGN (Color) - There's No Business Like Show Business [Charles LeMaire, Travilla, Miles White]
1955 (28th):
COSTUME DESIGN (Color) - Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing [Charles LeMaire] [OSCAR WINNER]
COSTUME DESIGN (Color) - The Virgin Queen [Charles LeMaire, Mary Wills]
1956 (29th):
COSTUME DESIGN (B&W)  - Teenage Rebel [Charles LeMaire, Mary Wills]
1957 (30th):
COSTUME DESIGN        - An Affair to Remember [Charles LeMaire]
1958 (31st):
COSTUME DESIGN        - A Certain Smile [Charles LeMaire, Mary Wills]
1959 (32nd):
COSTUME DESIGN (B&W)  - The Diary of Anne Frank [Charles LeMaire, Mary Wills]

and he won three (3) Oscars for BEST COSTUME DESIGN (when credited with "Wardrobe Direction") for the following films:
•  All About Eve
•  The Robe
•  Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing

For example, in the film "All About Eve", LeMaire designed the costumes for Anne Baxter, Celeste Holm, Thelma Ritter, Barbara Bates, and Marilyn Monroe, whilst Edith Head (on loan from Paramount) designed the costumes for Bette Davis. They both shared the Oscar win for best costume design in this film.

The NO vote means he was not a costume designer for the above three Oscar-winning films and seven other nominated films, which is clearly wrong.

Since the Academy recognized his credit (Wardrobe Direction) as a credit for Costume Design, I unhesitatingly voted YES!
 Last edited: by ObiKen
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorRutan
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Australia Posts: 2,295
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Thank you for the vote of confidence in Wardrobe Direction as I myself thought this way. Others did not so I just was not going to argue.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNosferatu
Registered: March 24, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 1,204
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
The designation of wardrobe director implies a supervisory role in the costumes worn and designed. Rutan is right to draw the parallel with a similar role in the sound department, one we recognise and use without controversy.

In all of his obituaries, he is described as an Oscar-winning costume designer, a description borne out by the recognition from the Academy. As ObiKen's post shows, removing his credits from films for which he won (or was nominated for) Academy Awards for his work as a costume designer would be absurd.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorprimetime21
Registered: October 4, 2008
Reputation: Great Rating
Posts: 312
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Here's the thing, while I don't disagree with the premise of this re: Wardrobe Director, I do find it hard to say, after 34 votes (as of this writing) that with a 3 vote lead we can clearly say Wardrobe Director = Costume Supervisor.  What if the next 4 people vote no?  Do we then change?

It's times like these where I wish someone "official" would weigh in.  34 people is a small number of people compared to the number that use this database and none of us have been given authority to make "official" decisions.

So while I liikely wouldn't vote no on someone that contributes a credit based on Wardrobe Director, I also have a hard time saying a few of us voting in a poll has clearly determined this answer (or any other poll with a small number of votes that is so close).
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorscotthm
Registered: March 20, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,845
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting primetime21:
Quote:
I do find it hard to say, after 34 votes (as of this writing) that with a 3 vote lead we can clearly say Wardrobe Director = Costume Supervisor.

I don't.  I think it's clear that directors are considered supervising roles, e.g. Recording Director and Visual/Digital/Special/Special Visual Effects Director.  The rule does say to, "include 'Supervising' credits in the above categories".  But if you feel such a credit is controversial it's best (IMO) that you not contribute such credits, unless you make clear the actual screen credit in your contribution notes.

---------------
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorObiKen
Registered: October 22, 2015
Reputation: Superior Rating
Australia Posts: 257
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting primetime21:
Quote:
Here's the thing, while I don't disagree with the premise of this re: Wardrobe Director, I do find it hard to say, after 34 votes (as of this writing) that with a 3 vote lead we can clearly say Wardrobe Director = Costume Supervisor.  What if the next 4 people vote no?  Do we then change?

I understand what you say, a poll is just a gauge at a particular point in time and its measurement and significance will vary depending upon the audience size and the information provided to make an informed decision.

For the past three and a half years, the focus has been on the credit rule and whether it is used strictly as a rigid template or as a guide, particularly for a rarely used film credit from the 1950's.

The poll result was YES (valid)=6 and NO (invalid)=15 on January 09, 2022.

After the recent post regarding his Academy Award nominations and Oscar wins for BEST COSTUME DESIGN when using the film credit "Wardrobe Direction", the poll is now YES (18) and NO (16).
Were the NO voters in the past (2018-2021) equally informed as the voters of today, I doubt it.
Quote:

It's times like these where I wish someone "official" would weigh in.  34 people is a small number of people compared to the number that use this database and none of us have been given authority to make "official" decisions.

Agreed, but then why was the Costume Design credit marked as invalid in the Common Name post for Charles LeMaire after just 21 votes? If left unchecked, the danger is his Common Name post (or this poll) may end up being used as an authority to remove his costume design credits, even for films in which he won an Oscar for BEST COSTUME DESIGN. I am not comfortable with that absurd outcome, how about you?
Quote:

So while I liikely wouldn't vote no on someone that contributes a credit based on Wardrobe Director, I also have a hard time saying a few of us voting in a poll has clearly determined this answer (or any other poll with a small number of votes that is so close).

His Academy Award nominations and Oscar wins using the film credit "Wardrobe Direction" were never mentioned during the poll period 2018-2021. It's only the last couple days that voters have been made aware of additional facts about the credit and the voting pattern has been so far an overwhelming YES (valid).
 Last edited: by ObiKen
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNosferatu
Registered: March 24, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 1,204
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I don't have any problem with those who changed their vote based on new information. It reminds me of the quote “When I find new information I change my mind; what do you do?”

Assuming wardrobe director is an invalid category because it isn't specified in the rules isn't wrong. I would take issue with someone who keeps that opinion when they know that for most publications and accrediting bodies in film during Mr LeMaire's life, wardrobe director = costume director.

As has been said, it's a crying shame we don't have anyone to give a definitive ruling and amend the rules to reflect the Academy for Motion Pictures and Sciences' criteria and to stay consistent with the wording in sound and visual effects departments.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,508
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
This thread raises an interesting question. Do we include people for what we know they did, or for how they are credited?

ObiKen's argument seems to (partially, at least) indicate the former. But that doesn't seem to be how we have done it in the past. Otherwise Willis O'Brien should be credited for Visual Effects in King Kong (1933), because anyone who knows anything about special effects should know O'Brien's contributions. But he is not included, because his credit is "Chief Technician".

If we go by how they are credited, then the "Director = Supervisor" argument may have some merit. But is the reason that "Wardrobe Direction" isn't in the rules that Ken just didn't think of it, or was it a conscious decision not to include it? It's not in the "Incorrect roles" column, so probably not a conscious decision, but who knows?
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorninso4
Registered: January 16, 2010
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 1,617
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I started this thread because I was not really sure about this credit. I think you can find good arguments for both options and both views are also compatible with the rules with some interpretation.
The fact that Charles LeMaire got Oscar nominations or wins for a few of his credits was not even known at that time, at least not to me.

For the common Name thread I had to decide in some direction. Since there was a clear majority for an invalid credit at that time, I marked these entries as invalid.
Now, of course, we have new information and I think this should be taken into account. It seems that many people here have changed their opinion and the majority is now in favor of a valid credit.
To come back to the original credit:
Wardrobe Director is not listed under the crew roles in the contribution rules. This speaks against a valid credit.
One could argue that a Director falls under the part of the rules that deals with "supervising" credits. Although I would not subscribe to that 100%.

Sometimes Charles LeMaire was also listed as Executive Wardrobe Designer, which I listed as valid. Because at least the title of the designer is present here, which is valid in any case.

In favor of a valid entry is that his films are older films, where the crew entries are nowhere near as formalized as is usually the case with newer films. I think everyone who enters older films into the database knows that it sometimes takes some imagination to enter the crew entries correctly. The rules are based on modern job descriptions. For older and non-English speaking movies, the descriptions usually don't match completely and have to be adjusted to encompass the meaning of the crew roles.
By that logic, I think one can argue for Wardrobe Director as a valid credit.

Charles LeMaire is the only person I've come across with such a credit so far. It seems to be a specific role created just for him. Until now, I had not interpreted this role as having really had anything to do with the costume design of the individual films. But rather as if he had more of a general role.
But since he even got Oscars for this role, it seems like he did work directly on the films after all. In this case I would not reject an entry in the database as a costume designer. What is good enough for the Academy should be good enough for the Invelos database.

I will have a look at the common name thread soon and take this discussion into account when updating the thread next time.

Of course, the best outcome would be an authority that makes a decision on such issues. But that's not going to happen, unfortunately.
Think different

Everything will be okay in the end. If it's not okay, it's not the end.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDanae Cassandra
Registered: Apr 11, 2004
Registered: May 26, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,877
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Personally, what I would like to see with a Costume Design credit in the rules would be a note like there is in the Sound credits.

So, to refresh memory, under Sound there is a note "Only use when there's no production sound mixing credit"

What I would like to see would be Wardrobe / Wardrobe by / Wardrobe Supervisor / Wardrobe Director note "Only use when there is no costume design credit."  This seems like it should keep the valid wardrobe credits, but might eliminate the ones where that's the person in charge of keeping up with costumes, rather than the designer.

Of course, even if we wanted to go that direction, we can't since Ken isn't active any more.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.
-- Thorin Oakenshield
 Last edited: by Danae Cassandra
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNosferatu
Registered: March 24, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 1,204
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Danae Cassandra:
Quote:
Personally, what I would like to see with a Costume Design credit in the rules would be a note like there is in the Sound credits.

So, to refresh memory, under Sound there is a note "Only use when there's no production sound mixing credit"

What I would like to see would be Wardrobe / Wardrobe by / Wardrobe Supervisor / Wardrobe Director note "Only use when there is no costume design credit."  This seems like it should keep the valid wardrobe credits, but might eliminate the ones where that's the person in charge of keeping up with costumes, rather than the designer.

Of course, even if we wanted to go that direction, we can't since Ken isn't active any more.

In the case of All About Eve, that would deprive Edith Head of her credit in a film for which she won an Oscar.

DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,508
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Nosferatu:
Quote:
In the case of All About Eve, that would deprive Edith Head of her credit in a film for which she won an Oscar.

Unless I missunderstand what Danae wrote, it would  deprive Charles LeMaire of his credit.
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 4  Previous   Next