| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
just throwing this one out there...
Single Name Field... All parsing problems go away!
oooh - you're just itching for a fight aren't you?   who.... me? | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,117 |
| | Posted: | | | | My one wish would be a Facebook application for DVD Profiler. | | | | Last edited: by Doombear |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Overview texting for itallics, bold, etc., FINALLY
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,917 |
| | Posted: | | | | Having bold/ital for Overviews would be my #1 pick.
I can almost hear Ken: "Damn, that's the hardest one to implement!" |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
just throwing this one out there...
Single Name Field... All parsing problems go away!
oooh - you're just itching for a fight aren't you?
who.... me? That wouldn't solve the problem, Pete, I wish it would but it won't. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 26, 2007 | | Posts: 196 |
| | Posted: | | | | Better plugin SDK support would be at the top of my list. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Quoting Addicted2DVD:
Quote:
just throwing this one out there...
Single Name Field... All parsing problems go away!
oooh - you're just itching for a fight aren't you?
who.... me?
That wouldn't solve the problem, Pete, I wish it would but it won't.
Skip how wouldn't it?.... if there is only one field... there is no choices on how to PARSE the name. Which is all I claimed... that all parsing problems would go away. | | | | Pete |
|
  | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 8,736 |
| | Posted: | | | | Just one, eh? In that case, I guess I'm going to have to second Pete's request for a single name field - it's the only way to stop the endless parsing debates, and implementing this will result in HUGE amounts of pointless double entries for the same people to be eliminated from the database in one fell swoop. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting ruineddaydreams: Quote:
i'll go with text effects for overview  - i am sick of the character ' I would go with this one as well. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
how wouldn't it?.... if there is only one field... there is no choices on how to PARSE the name. Which is all I claimed... that all parsing problems would go away. You know, all kidding aside, this has just reminded me when I suggested this is another thread, it was quite popular but I never got round to making a formal Feature Request. I think I'll do that now. |
|
| Registered: May 29, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,475 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'd wish for more wishes! Text effects for the overview would be my #1 choice. |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 2,366 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote:
Quoting ruineddaydreams:
Quote:
i'll go with text effects for overview - i am sick of the character '
I would go with this one as well. That would be my second wish.  | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 17,334 |
| | Posted: | | | | Out of curiosity... I counted and up to this point... the top 2 things requested (or agreed with) are... 1. Text Effects in Overview (9 ppl want) 2. Child Profile Downloaded with Parent (4 people want) So hopefully we will at least get both of these. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: April 4, 2007 | | Posts: 7 |
| | Posted: | | | | A complete Master Translation Source File, with all strings. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,394 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote:
Out of curiosity... I counted and up to this point... the top 2 things requested (or agreed with) are...
1. Text Effects in Overview (9 ppl want)
2. Child Profile Downloaded with Parent (4 people want)
So hopefully we will at least get both of these. To the above I would add the ability to INSERT a name into a cast list rather than append it at the bottom and then have to move it to where it belongs. You can currently INSERT a divider where you want one, which is handy. Moving a name is inconvenient if you have a long cast list. A related idea would be the ability to move a BLOCK of names at one time instead of just one at a time. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole)
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.
DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 4,596 |
| | Posted: | | | | The ability to paste cast & crew without overwriting what's already there. | | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
|