|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 4 5 6 7 8 ...10 Previous Next
|
Decline Reasons |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,804 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: Quoting Staid S Barr:
Quote: Quoting Kevin Coed:
Quote:
Says the man who tried to slip IMDB data through a little while ago.
Problem is that sometimes even IMDB gets it right, and then we can't see the difference. Or should we now start spiking our data?
I'm not sure I've ever seen IMDb get both the cast names and rolenames correct (per the actual film credits) for any movie! Confirmed: The very first time I was perplex/curious about the quality of imdb data was when I lately checked cast and crew of a special german tv series. In some episodes the crew was completely wrong and the cast partially wrong. Maybe a kind of "data-watermark"?? | | | Thorsten | | | Last edited: by kahless |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 810 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: ... This is not a hard concept to undferstand.
Skip OK, I think I know what you were trying to say, but I can't quite understand you. Note to Skip, use FireFox, it will underline in red your typing errors so that we can better understand you. pdf | | | Paul Francis San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,372 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting pdf256: Quote: Quoting skipnet50:
Quote: ... This is not a hard concept to undferstand.
Skip OK, I think I know what you were trying to say, but I can't quite understand you.
Note to Skip, use FireFox, it will underline in red your typing errors so that we can better understand you.
pdf Best part is he does use Firefox! (or at least used to ) |
| Registered: May 9, 2007 | Posts: 1,536 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting kahless: Quote: Quoting skipnet50:
Quote: Staid:
As long as the data is taken from the FILM it's OK. If you take it from somewhere else it is NOT OK. This is not a hard concept to undferstand.
Skip
THIS simple rule should be understood by everyone - Q'apla skip! Don't take me seriously ALL the time... | | | Hans |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 4,596 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting pdf256: Quote: Note to Skip, use FireFox, it will underline in red your typing errors so that we can better understand you.
pdf That won't work as I don't think Skip can see red ...j/k | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | No comment. Needs a bull fighting smiley.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,022 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: No comment. Needs a bull fighting smiley.
Skip Olé!!! | | | |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 278 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Staid S Barr: Quote: Quoting Kevin Coed:
Quote:
Says the man who tried to slip IMDB data through a little while ago.
Problem is that sometimes even IMDB gets it right, and then we can't see the difference. Or should we now start spiking our data? When someone tries to add uncredited cast and it matches IMDB and there are no notes for the source of the data then I think it's a safe bet that it's come from IMDB and nowhere else. | | | Guns don't kill people. Hammers do. |
| Registered: May 16, 2007 | Posts: 12 |
| Posted: | | | | Seeing as how the Rules specifically say not to use Third Party databases, martin and Ken recently specifically said NO IMDb,
Skip
One thing I learned the past few days, in contributing never use the "IM..-word". As stated by Skip, I cannot find the rule about not using "third party databases" in the RULES. But OK what is acceptable for entering uncredited cast data, using data from a specified site that is 'specialised' in the film, revealing interesting not-credited players? Or just the fact that you see a wellkown player that is not in the credits? On another place it is said don't use data that are not on the film, this seems easy to understand, but how does this match with the fact that uncredited players are allowed. Somehow I have the feeling the very strict rule handling with respect to actors and players is not always very productive. When you enter the work of several hours on methodically naming cast and crew for 12 Episodes of a very interesting Series (Yes I like to do that kind of work) , it seems a bit overreacted when the contribution is declined because a very small number of uncredited actors were taken from IM.. (don't say the word). I encounter almost every day profiles with incomplete or wrong covers (f.i. english ones in a dutch profile), overviews that don't even look like the ones on the covers, all kind of mistakes that are in my eyes far more serious than the fact whether Linda Hunt is an uncredited voice in the series 'Carnivàle', IM.. says so and think I can hear it. I think this very strict and not allways very clear clinging to the RULES is leaving lots of interesting facts out of the profiles. Some time ago someone, a very active forum member, suggested 'Just change the IM.. description a little'. Is it not a problem now that many will use IM.. and not say so, and with respect to the credits, just say it all is contributed as in the end credits. Mind you, I don't advocate this! But it might be a problem. I do understand the legal problems around IM.., but please don't pin someone who is advocating the use of it as a background reference like a criminal. At IM.. they are not all morons, look at the number of bad and very incomplete profiles we have on DVP. SimonD |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Simon: With all due respect, then you are blind try reading the introduction to the Rules and you will find the following. "Please don't submit content from a third party database, and always verify the specifications printed on the cover." This is not hard to comprehend. Also in the Rules realtive to Cast and Cree, you will find instrcutions on how to enter data and where to take it from "take the actor information from the end credits only, with names and roles listed exactly as they are in the credits and in exactly the same order credited."There is a similar phrase in the crew Section This is also NOT hard to comprehend. Simon, all you have to do is read the Rules and Follow them, they are not intended to be hard to comprehend, they are meant to be as simple as possible and staight forward. If you wish to use IMDb, you are FREE to do so but do NOT contribute said data, it is for your local use ONLY. Is that to hard. Give it up, dude. You can rationalize it all you want, but the fact is we have Rules here, you know you can track 10,000 titles for FREE at IMDb, perhaps if you think that they are so wonderfully accurate and useful you should make use of that option. They also don't require very much from their users to Contribute. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Now Simon. let's sit downm together and THINK about how I might handle dealing with an uncredited actor. Hmmm most DVD players generate what we refer to as a time-stamp, that could be used to identify the point in the film where I see this person, or I could do a Screen Cap. Or the actor MIGHT be mentioned in some of the supplementary material.
See there are all kinds of possibilities. Now are we going to generate the gigantic lists of (uncredited) data that can be found elsewhere...not very likely, because most of those peopole will be very difficult, at best and sometimes impossible to document.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,635 |
| Posted: | | | | If I might add a small spin on this... We see a performer who is not credited on the film. We recognize the performer. We note a time stamp; we pull a screen cap. IMDb lists the performer as an uncredited performer, as does AMG & at least one other third party database. We know this performer is who we think he/she is.
I think adding the performer to the cast list, at the end, alphabetical among the uncredited performers, citing the time stamp (or) the screen cap, that this provides reasonable documentation that the uncredited performer is, in fact, in the film.
I cite IMDb, AMG, not as a source to be listed when submitting the data, but as a personal reinforcement that the performer you think is in the film, is in the film. That it is not David Doyle, but Tom Beasley, for example. (Does anyone remember why Doyle's character was named Beasley?) | | | If it wasn't for bad taste, I wouldn't have no taste at all.
Cliff |
| Registered: May 16, 2007 | Posts: 12 |
| Posted: | | | | That is one of the minor aspects of many Forum reactions, downgrading the other and endlessly repeating that everything is SO clear and SO simple. 'With all due respect, then you are blind' seems to be rather contradictory. OK I overlooked a line in the introduction. I'll ask my wife to overhear me sometime, trying te memorize things completely. But sorry I find the term 'third party databasae' rather vague. I guess I am just stupid. By speaking of the possibility to track 10.000 titles By Free, and 'perhaps you think they are so wonderfully complete and accurate and useful' you make a mockerey of what I say.
VibroCount's reaction is more helpful, but sometimes I think we are trying to make things more complicated than it is. An example. I just finished the Profile for the French Arthouse Film "'Masculin féminin" (EAN 8 716777 050422). It is completely clear that a small role is played by Brigitte Bardot, there is even a screenshot of her on the backside cover, somewhat less familiar but also well known is Françoise Hardy. Two actors that I think 90% of my generation (60's) are very familiar with. They are not credited (yes IM.. does so correctly) but seeing is knowing. Why need time stamps/screen caps. The fact that these actresses were not mentioned is very interesting, it shoul not be missed.
I never suggested to throw away the rules, or disregard them. I just mentioned that the strict adherence to THE RULES, sometimes seems to stand in the way. I would like to use very detailed sites that have specialised in one film or series and it looks to simple to me by only hammering in IT IS NOT IN THE RULES, SO DON'T USE IT. SimonD |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Simon: Indeed and deliberately so. You were the one that said "I cannot find the rule about not using "third party databases" in the RULES." and I poiunted you to it on the very FIRST page of the Rules. There are many databases out there besides IMDb., some of them even go so far as to license use of IMDb data. Instead of trying to nail down and list every possible, which of course lead to some user finding a new one saying "but it is not in the list". We chose the blanket NO third party database, which covers ALL of them. That does not mean they cannot be used as reference source, but it DOES mean their data is theirs and DON'T copy it. That said I would not use ANY third party database as my sole reference source, in most instances at least and it is hard to make blanket statements in this realm. But I have seen actor's websites that will give you a link to somewhere to get their filmography and sometimes that somewhere is IMDb, well the actor signed off on it...so in that case I would so note it. Why need time stamps and screen caps because unlike IMDb we have a RECORD of the activity on a title and documentation is required. I might recognize a photo of Mr. Hardy but I don't recognize the name. So your statement in that area is presumptious, should I say the same thing about Kathleen Freeman, I havementioned here several times in the last couple of years, most users seem to not recognize the name, but a few have looked up her photo and said yeah, I know who she is now. You need to understand that you are dealing with a vast Community of users from all over the world, all from varying points in time and with varying tastes ( or lack thereof ) in film. . Why would you expect any user to simply accept your word on something, that is what IMDb seems to do and they have a train wreck for a database. There is no requirement for you to Contribute to the database, you can choose to do your own thing and no one will care. But if you wish to be an active participant in the construction of what will eventually be the world's most accurate entertainment database COMPLETE with documentation to back it up then simply follow the Rules. If you can't figure out how something should be handled ar as you noted about (uncredited) simply ask the question and someone will assist you. I don't care about DETAILED websites, we have ONE single source for data and that is the FILM itself PERIOD. WE have one small exception to this particular rule and it is designed for specific purposes as the Rules spell out. "If an actor is credited by name but does not have an associated role, you may use another source to identify the role." I think at the root of the problem here is that you do not understand the function of the Online database versus your local. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,479 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting SimonD: Quote: That is one of the minor aspects of many Forum reactions, downgrading the other and endlessly repeating that everything is SO clear and SO simple. 'With all due respect, then you are blind' seems to be rather contradictory. OK I overlooked a line in the introduction. I'll ask my wife to overhear me sometime, trying te memorize things completely. But sorry I find the term 'third party databasae' rather vague. I guess I am just stupid. By speaking of the possibility to track 10.000 titles By Free, and 'perhaps you think they are so wonderfully complete and accurate and useful' you make a mockerey of what I say.
VibroCount's reaction is more helpful, but sometimes I think we are trying to make things more complicated than it is. An example. I just finished the Profile for the French Arthouse Film "'Masculin féminin" (EAN 8 716777 050422). It is completely clear that a small role is played by Brigitte Bardot, there is even a screenshot of her on the backside cover, somewhat less familiar but also well known is Françoise Hardy. Two actors that I think 90% of my generation (60's) are very familiar with. They are not credited (yes IM.. does so correctly) but seeing is knowing. Why need time stamps/screen caps. The fact that these actresses were not mentioned is very interesting, it shoul not be missed.
I never suggested to throw away the rules, or disregard them. I just mentioned that the strict adherence to THE RULES, sometimes seems to stand in the way. I would like to use very detailed sites that have specialised in one film or series and it looks to simple to me by only hammering in IT IS NOT IN THE RULES, SO DON'T USE IT. SimonD Simon, you are not alone, some other people are 100% OK with what you think. It's just a little difficult to be understood here. | | | Images from movies |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 4 5 6 7 8 ...10 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|