| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 22, 2007 |  Posts: 95 |
| |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 |  Posts: 28 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yes I love this feature too, I find it quite relaxing to search for missing "mugs". I have amassed over 2,000 so far mostly well known and more obscure British thesps. A great addition to DVD Profiler I think  |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 1,022 |
| |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,692 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting richierich: Quote:
Glad I'm not the only perv here  Wish there was some way of flagging just the good ones and then exporting that database dump.. now thats a collection that everybody would want..  | | | | Paul |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,692 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting jykke: Quote:
OK, my cast/crew backup file is here: www.jykke.fi/Jykke.dpb Thanks for this I've downloaded it and have found some pictures better than what I had. Whats interesting is that the size of picture which is used to compare the images is much larger than what I though was the standard size we should be resizing to.. I have been using a size off 200 pixels high for new ones I make myself - but I may have to change this now since it looks like the program is expecting much larger and then it resizes them down if necessary.  | | | | Paul |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 278 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting richierich: Quote:
Quoting pauls42:
Quote:
Quoting Ron:
Quote:
My head shots might not be tasteful for everyone, I try to use the best cleavage shot for my actresses
I do the same..
Glad I'm not the only perv here Wherever possible I use naked or topless photos of the actresses. It's the only sensible option. | | | | Guns don't kill people. Hammers do. |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Posts: 41 |
| | Posted: | | | | NOw we just need someone to share their newly customized "attractive" sets.  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 793 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting pauls42: Quote:
Whats interesting is that the size of picture which is used to compare the images is much larger than what I though was the standard size we should be resizing to.. I have been using a size off 200 pixels high for new ones I make myself - but I may have to change this now since it looks like the program is expecting much larger and then it resizes them down if necessary. Actually, if you look at the compare window, there is a "stretch to fit" radio button, set that to "actual size" and you'll see that Profiler keeps a rather small headshot.  EDIT: Nevermind, just noticed on another headshots that it does in fact save the bigger image when it's there.  | | | | Last edited: by RossRoy |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 793 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'm all for those special headshots. They should be posted! |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,242 |
| |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 350 |
| | Posted: | | | | I believe that the headshots maintained have a maximum size of 300x400 pixels. It will resize down to its maximum if you drag a larger image ... | | | | -fred |
|
| Registered: March 22, 2007 | | Posts: 95 |
| |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 |  Posts: 374 |
| | Posted: | | | | Happy it worked out well. Should I also send the ones Kevin prefers?  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,692 |
| |
| Registered: May 16, 2007 | | Posts: 154 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | | Attracted to "svelte buoyant waterfowl". |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 793 |
| | Posted: | | | | I've just submitted my headshots file. Don't know how helpful it'll be, I don't think I've added all that many  |
|