| Author |
Message |
  | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 8,667 |
| | Posted: | | | | I've just bought a Blu-ray with two DTS-HD Master Audio 3.0 tracks on it. Unfortunately, DVD Profiler has 2-Channel Stereo, it has 4.0, but it does not have 3.0. Can we have this added, please? |
|
| Registered: April 3, 2008 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 624 |
| | Posted: | | | | +1 | | | | http://www.mulligansmovies.com/ |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 20,111 |
| | Posted: | | | | +1
I also have a number of Blu-rays with DTS-HD Master Audio 2.0 "Surround" tracks (not Stereo) | | | | Corey |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 4,530 |
| |
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 4,479 |
| | Posted: | | | | +1
About channels (for Dolby Digital and DTS), I also regret 1.0 and 2.0 tracks, as it is a very different information from mono and stereo, and much more interesting. The sound of 1.0 mono has not the same effect in a room than 2.0 mono. | | | | Images from movies | | | | Last edited: by surfeur51 |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 2,337 |
| | Posted: | | | | +1, also PCM 3.0 needed. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,774 |
| |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 553 |
| |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 5,734 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
I've just bought a Blu-ray with two DTS-HD Master Audio 3.0 tracks on it. Just out of curiosity, which of the seven channels are being used? | | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting bbbbb: Quote:
Quoting T!M:
Quote:
I've just bought a Blu-ray with two DTS-HD Master Audio 3.0 tracks on it.
Just out of curiosity, which of the seven channels are being used? If they used the right name this would be Front Left, Front Right and Center. | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: September 18, 2008 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 2,650 |
| | Posted: | | | | Also DTS-HD Master Audio 11.1 Neo X would be nice as found on The Expendables 2 Blu-ray. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 20,111 |
| | Posted: | | | | Some new Universal Blu-ray releases (Earthquake & Midway) have what's labeled "DTS-HD Master Audio 2.1 Sensurround" on the back covers.
I'm not sure if they're technically Mono/Stereo or Surround, but it would certainly be nice to get an update in the program to cover these oddities. I would assume the "Sensurround" is just the subwoofer bass track, judging by many of the older DVD releases. | | | | Corey |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,188 |
| | Posted: | | | | My guess is it's just a regular 2.0 surround track with some extra deep sub so unless the actual encoding on the disc is something else we're already covered. | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: March 18, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,404 |
| | Posted: | | | | The real problem seems to be wishy-washy standards, or lack thereof. To keep up with the mess, DVDP would probably need a free form text field. Kind of a shame. Are all these "oddities" actually defined by the Industry somewhere, or creative embellishments by the media companies? | | | Thanks for your support.
Free Plugins available here.
Advanced plugins available here.
Hey, new product!!! BDPFrog. | | | | Last edited: by mediadogg |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 20,111 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting iPatsa: Quote:
My guess is it's just a regular 2.0 surround track with some extra deep sub so unless the actual encoding on the disc is something else we're already covered. DTS-HD Master Audio in the program does not even currently support "Surround" — so it's not really covered if that's the case. There is 4.1, but that's the closest thing to 2.1. It doesn't even offer 3.1 like other audio formats in the program right now. | | | | Corey | | | | Last edited: by Katatonia |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,188 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Katatonia: Quote:
Quoting iPatsa:
DTS-HD Master Audio in the program does not even currently support "Surround" — so it's not really covered if that's the case.
We have digged into this issue before and if I recall correctly there is no surround flag carried by the DTS 2.0 data stream that can be detected by software, unlike Dolby Digital 2.0 which can either be "stereo" or "surround" (or even 2-channel mono). So how we could be expected to enter this information correctly in the database would be anyone's guess. Since there really is no compelling reason to make the distinction anyway, I have suggested that the program option should simply be labeled as "stereo/surround" to avoid this sort of unecessary complication. Sometimes I think we demand too much technical minutiae for our own good. | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|